|
The newsletter is distributed gratis to
subscribers. Get onto our mailing list without
obligation at
www.cosmology.info/newsletter.
The current newsletter is a review of papers
published under astro-ph on arXiv for the month
of January, 2009. If you have suggestions of
papers you may have come across, please send
them to Hilton or Eric.
Contemporary cosmology has developed
methodological latitude that surpasses the
boundaries of physical science, and allowed what
scientists of a bygone era might have called
‘bad habits”.
We see the explicit imposition of metaphysics
(Black Holes and Dark Matter), the usurping of
empirical evidence by mathematical constructs
(analysis of the CMBR), and the blatant ignoring
of contra-evidence, as listed continuously in
our newsletters.
Black Holes
One of the most crucial assumptions used in
support of the LCDMM is that of Black Holes. It
is vital that Black Holes exist if high-z
remoteness is to be accepted. Observational
evidence raised in support of BHs is the
measurement of high energy radiation, which is
conventionally ascribed to the output of a BH
environment. However, advancing technology, like
this MAGIC study, has enabled the measurement of
HE gamma radiation emanating from conventional
compact objects, making any conclusion at best
ambiguous.
Title:
Discovery of very high energy
gamma-rays from the flat spectrum radio quasar
3C 279 with the MAGIC telescope
Authors:
M. Errando, R.
Bock, D.
Kranich, E.
Lorenz, P.
Majumdar, M.
Mariotti, D.
Mazin, E.
Prandini, F.
Tavecchio, M.
Teshima, R.
Wagner, for the MAGIC
Collaboration arXiv:0901.3275
Time dilation
Since the notion that SNe light curves provide
evidence of time dilation has now been
comprehensively debunked (by Andrews, Lerner,
and others, and now also Observations of type 1a
supernovae are consistent with a static universe
David F. Crawford, arXiv:0901.4172),
attention now shifts to other objects. GRBs,
measured to redshifts z>6, should of course be
clear indicators of time dilation in a
relativistically expanding Universe. David
Crawford shows that they are not: “Einstein’s
theory of relativity is quite definite that if
the universe is expanding then the observed
duration of these measures will increase with
redshift. Thus gamma-ray burst measures should
show a time dilation proportional to redshift.
An analysis of gamma-ray burst data shows that
the hypothesis of time dilation is rejected with
a probability of 4.4×10−6 for redshifts out to
z=6.6…Alternatively it is shown that all the
data are consistent with a static cosmology and
that if a static cosmology is valid then it can
easily explain the results obtained from a
concordance cosmology analysis…Thus there is
strong support for the notion that there is no
time dilation (and) that the universe is not
expanding.”
Title:
No Evidence of Time Dilation in Gamma-Ray
Burst Data
Author:
David F. Crawford arXiv:0901.4169
HUDF
Nikita Nabokov and Yurij Baryshev have performed
an in-depth analysis of 4,000 galaxies in the
range z = 0.5—6.5 from the Hubble Ultra Deep
Field, and find, “…possible superlarge
inhomogeneities in the radial distribution of
galaxies…with scale lengths as large as 2,000
Mpc.” In this important study, they obtain
diagrams of angular size/redshift and surface
brightness/redshift, classical, key
relationships in testing the Hubble law. They
conclude, “An analysis of the distribution of
HUDF galaxies reveals strong deviations of the
observed number of galaxies from the number of
galaxies expected for a uniform distribution.”
Title: Classical Cosmological Tests for Galaxies
of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field
Authors:
Nikita V. Nabokov, Yuriy
V. Baryshev
arXiv:0901.0405
The CFHQS has now discovered 10 QSOs at z
@ 6.0,
and appears to be continuing to do so. They are
valuable objects in any cosmological study,
these particularly so since this study finds,
“The new quasars have luminosities 10 to 75
times lower than the most luminous SDSS quasars
at this redshift.”
Title:
Six more quasars at redshift 6 discovered
by the Canada-France High-z Quasar Survey
Authors:
C. J. Willott, P.
Delorme, C.
Reyle, L.
Albert, J.
Bergeron, D.
Crampton, X.
Delfosse, T.
Forveille, J.
B. Hutchings, R.
J. McLure, A.
Omont, D.
Schade
arXiv:0901.0565
The technique of Maser parallax is providing a
sorely-needed second check on distance measures.
However, the results are not comforting: “We
have used the VLBA to measure the annual
parallax of the H2O masers in the star-forming
region IRAS 00420+5530. This measurement yields
a direct distance estimate of 2.17±0.05 kpc
(<3%), which disagrees substantially with the
standard kinematic distance estimate of ∼4.6
kpc…The 3-dimensional space velocity of IRAS
00420+5530 at this new, more accurate distance
implies a substantial non-circular and
anomalously slow Galactic orbit…as well as
line-of-sight velocity residuals in the rotation
curve analysis of Brand & Blitz (1993). …[]…The
direct geometric distance estimate reported here
is more than a factor of two closer than the
kinematic distance of ∼4.7 kpc implied by a
radial velocity of −46 km s−1 using the rotation
curve of Brand & Blitz (1993).”
Title:
A Precise Distance to IRAS 00420+5530 via H2O
Maser Parallax with the VLBA
Authors:
G. A. Moellenbrock,
M. J. Claussen,
W. M. Goss (NRAO)
arXiv:0901.0517
Astrometric measurements using the VBLA find
remarkably similar inconsistencies: “We find
that young pulsars are moving away from the
Galactic plane, as expected, and that age
estimates from kinematics and pulsar spindown
are generally in agreement, with certain notable
exceptions…For several high-latitude pulsars,
the NE2001 electron density model underestimates
the parallax distances by a factor of two, while
in others the estimates agree with or are larger
than the parallax distances, suggesting that the
interstellar medium is irregular on relevant
length scales.”
Title:
Precision Astrometry with the Very Long Baseline
Array: Parallaxes and Proper Motions for 14
Pulsars
Authors:
S. Chatterjee,
W. F. Brisken,
W. H. T. Vlemmings,
W. M. Goss,
T. J. W. Lazio,
J. M. Cordes,
S. E. Thorsett,
E. B. Fomalont,
A. G. Lyne,
M. Kramer
arXiv:0901.1436
Quasars
Martin Lopez-Corredoira gave an invited talk, to
be published in the proceedings of the
conference “Evolution of Cosmic Objects through
their Physical Activity (V. Ambartsumian 100th
anniversary)”, held at Byurakan Observatory
(Armenia), on September 15th-18th, 2008. He
examines evidence for physical connections in
the light of Ambartsumian’s proposal that
“galaxies beget galaxies”.
Title:
Apparent discordant redshift QSO-galaxy
associations
Author:
Martin Lopez-Corredoira
arXiv:0901.4534
Stellar metallicity is a key parameter in
cosmological ageing. High-z studies are
consistently showing that galaxies do not evolve
inversely with redshift, as expected by the LCDM
model. The following papers are no exception:
“The inferred metallicity of the BLR gas is so
high (several times solar) that metal ejection
or mixing with lower metallicity gas in the host
galaxy is required to match the metallicities
observed in local massive galaxies. On average,
the observed metallicity changes neither among
quasars in the observed redshift range 4<z<6.4,
nor when compared with quasars at lower
redshifts…The data also suggest a lack of
evolution in the carbon abundance, even among
z>6 quasars. The latter result is puzzling,
since the minimum enrichment timescale of carbon
is about 1 Gyr, i.e. longer than the age of the
universe at z~6.”
Title: The
metallicity of the most distant quasars
Authors:
Y. Juarez,
R. Maiolino,
R. Mujica,
M. Pedani,
S. Marinoni,
T. Nagao,
A. Marconi,
E. Oliva
arXiv:0901.0974
Again: “We compare the metallicities in
high-redshift quasars to the star formation
rates (SFR) in their host galaxies using
measurements of broad emission lines and
far-infrared (FIR) luminosities…We detect high
metallicities throughout the sample, up to
several times solar, confirming that star
formation must have begun before the visible
quasar phase. However, we do not detect a trend
in metallicity versus current SFR.”
Title: Quasar
Metal Abundance and FIR Luminosity
Authors:
L. E. Simon, F.
Hamann arXiv:0901.4300
This study establishes link between QSOs and
gRSs, suggesting that quasars may over time
develop into giant galaxies.
Title:
Giant Radio Galaxies - old long-living quasars?
Authors:
B. V. Komberg, I.N.
Pashchenko arXiv:0901.3721
Imposing redshift-distance upon quasars brings
great difficulties for physics. Such a position
cannot be held unless metaphysical phenomena
like Black Holes and Dark Matter are invoked.
Conventional, empirically derived physics is
simply inadequate in such cases.
Title: A simple model to link the properties of
quasars to the properties of dark matter halos
out to high redshift
Author:
Darren J. Croton arXiv:0901.4104
Galaxy evolution
The discrepancy between popular models and
actual observation is cause for concern. This
study, while attempting to accommodate these
discrepancies within the LCDM interpretation of
a bottom-up hierarchy, nevertheless highlights
the observational evidence for top-down galaxy
formation along the lines proposed by Halton
Arp. In particular, the authors found
specifically that, “The data do clearly show
the trend that is generally referred to as
archaeological Down Sizing, i.e., massive
galaxies are older than low-mass galaxies.”
Title:
The Many Manifestations of Downsizing:
Hierarchical Galaxy Formation Models confront
Observations
Authors:
Fabio Fontanot,
Gabriella De Lucia,
Pierluigi Monaco,
Rachel S. Somerville,
Paola Santini
arXiv:0901.1130
The concordance model expects a clear
evolutionary correlation between age and z-1 (a
calibration of lookback time). Ferreras et al
examined 457 massive galaxies, and produce some
astonishing results, among them that, “…we
find that the number density of massive
early-type galaxies is consistent with no
evolution between z=1.2 and 0, i.e. over an
epoch spanning more than half of the current age
of the Universe.”
Title: On the formation of massive galaxies: A
simultaneous study of number density, size and
intrinsic colour evolution in GOODS
Authors:
Ignacio Ferreras,
Thorsten Lisker, Anna
Pasquali, Sadegh
Khochfar, Sugata
Kaviraj
arXiv:0901.4555
MOND
In an invited talk at “International Conference
on Particles and Nuclei (PANIC08), Eilat,
Israel, November 9-14, 2008”, Dr Jacob
Benkenstein outlined the case for relativistic
MOND: “Milgrom's Modified Newtonian Dynamics
(MOND) provides an efficient way to summarize
phenomenology of galaxies which does not lean on
the notion of dark matter; it has great
predictive power. Here I briefly review MOND as
well as its implementation as a nonrelativistic
modified gravity theory, AQUAL. Gravitational
lensing and cosmology call for a relativistic
gravity theory different from general relativity
if dark matter is to be avoided. In recent years
such a theory, TeVeS, has emerged from the
marriage of AQUAL with the timelike vector field
of Sanders.”
Title:
Relativistic MOND as an alternative to the dark
matter paradigm
Authors:
Jacob D. Bekenstein
arXiv:0901.1524
Geometry
The Big Bang expanding Universe is spatially
finite, as required by the underlying GRT.
Eminent Oxford cosmologist Joseph Silk
collaborated with Mihran Vardanyan and Roberto
Trotta to compare geometric models, and
controversially declare, “we show that, given
current data, the probability that the Universe
is spatially infinite lies between 67% and 98%,
depending on the choice of priors…[]…we have
shown that a model selection perspective places
much more taxing requirements on the accuracy of
future datasets than one would naively assume.
In particular, a 5σ detection threshold is
recommended in order to avoid both model
confusion and model ambiguity in the
determination of the geometry. However, if the
value of the curvature parameter is smaller than
∼10−4 we found that no amount of observations
will be able to decide on the true geometry of
the Universe. Achieving this lower limit will
require an improvement of another factor of 20
over what a CVL CMB experiment with an SKA–like
BAO probe will obtain. This might be feasible
once other, orthogonal datasets such as weak
lensing and SNIa observations are added to the
likelihood, although it will be a formidable
challenge to control systematics at this level
of statistical accuracy.” Bluntly put, the
world’s favourite cosmological model is
extremely unlikely.
Title:
How flat can you get? A model comparison
perspective on the curvature of the Universe
Authors:
Mihran Vardanyan,
Roberto Trotta,
Joe Silk
arXiv:0901.3354
CMBR
It appears that the original interpretation of
the MB discovered by Penzias and Wilson (that it
fulfilled the Big Bang prediction of Gaussian
homogeneity) was incorrect, probably because of
the low resolution of the original images. Since
then, COBE and WMAP have provided sharper data,
and compelled the authors of the Standard Model
to reformulate their prediction to fit
observations of non-Gaussianity. Ironically, all
of the CMBR studies currently being published
investigate anisotropies and inhomogeneities
that by definition, shouldn’t be there.
Title:
Modelling non-Gaussianity from foreground
contaminants
Author:
C.S. Carvalho
arXiv:0901.3613
The term “anomalous” is now standard terminology
in the glossary of WMAP analysis. (Note: Lead
author J M Diego was last year part of a team
that investigated the “Great Cold Spot” and
concluded that it too was anomalous).
Title: WMAP anomalous signal in the ecliptic
plane
Authors:
J.M Diego, M.
Cruz, J.
Gonzalez-Nuevo, M.
Maris, Y.
Ascasibar, C.
Burigana arXiv:0901.4344
Electricity
The synergy between electricity and magnetism
manifests in stellar dynamos, and we are able to
study this phenomenon close-up in the Sun. It is
intriguing however, to contemplate why serious
studies like this one ignore the comprehensive
experimental results obtained by plasma
physicists.
Title:
Paradigm shifts in solar dynamo modelling
Author:
Axel Brandenburg arXiv:0901.3789
The identification of Alfven waves as a driving
mechanism in stellar winds is an important
concession to plasma physics in cosmology.
Title: Alfven
waves as a driving mechanism in stellar winds
Authors:
A. A. Vidotto, V.
Jatenco-Pereira arXiv:0901.4573
|