The Alternative
Cosmology Group Newsletter - December 2009
The ACG newsletter
is distributed gratis to subscribers. Get onto
our mailing list without obligation at
www.cosmology.info/newsletter. The
current newsletter is a review of 1054 papers
published on arXiv under astro-ph, together with
576 under gen-phys, for the month of November,
2009. We now include papers archived elsewhere,
provided access is full and open. The
Alternative Cosmology Group draws its mandate
from the open letter published in New
Scientist, 2004 (www.cosmologystatement.org),
and this newsletter seeks to publicise recently
published empirical results that are aligned
with that ethos. If you would like to suggest
recently published or archived papers for
inclusion, please send the arXiv, viXra or other
direct reference and a brief exposition to
Hilton Ratcliffe (hilton@hiltonratcliffe.com).
Note that our spam filter rejects slash and
colon in the text, so please write web addresses
commencing “www”.
My face is red! In last
month’s editorial, I declared, “Some of us
noted with a measure of despondency that string
theorist Dr Brian Greene has filled the Lucasian
Chair of Mathematics vacated at Cambridge
University by retiring Professor Stephen
Hawking.” Of course, it’s not Brian Greene
at all who fills that hallowed chair. Thanks are
due to Kris Krogh, who pointed out, “The
person taking Hawking's position at Cambridge is
not Brian Greene (author of The Elegant
Universe) but Michael Green (co-author of a very
influential 1988 textbook, Superstring Theory,
written with Schwarz and Witten). Not
surprisingly, the two are often confused. I'm
not defending either of these people, or their
ideas.” Thanks for setting me straight,
Kris.
We received the following
email from Sotira Trifourki:
“I am writing to make an
enquiry into whether the Alternative Cosmology
Group are considering holding any future
meetings or conferences. I am currently acting
as director of the Cyprus Science Festival in
Cyprus, which is due to take place over a five
week period next year and as part of the
outreach activities a meeting is being organised
as a conference on space and astronomy in
Europe. I would like to offer the festival as an
opportunity for members of the alternative
cosmology group to attend and have an
alternative cosmology conference in its own
right, if nothing is planned for 2010.
“Kind Regards, Sotira
Trifourki”
sotira.t@googlemail.com
Overlooked
It seems we overlooked two
important contributions listed on viXra in
September.
José Juliá gave a novel explanation
for redshift by relating the Compton Effect to
the age of stars, and Marvin Herndon expanded on
his theory of nuclear fission-driven generation
of geomagnetic fields.
[12]
viXra:0909.0061
Cosmological Redshift, Compton Effect and Age of
the Stars
Authors:
José Francisco García Juliá
“Understanding the nature of matter comprising
the solar system is crucial for understanding
the mechanism that generates the earth's
geomagnetic field and magnetic fields of other
planets and satellites. The commonality of
matter in the solar system like that inside of
earth, together with common nuclear reactor
operating conditions, form the basis for
generalizing the author's concept of nuclear
georeactor geomagnetic field generation to
planetary magnetic field generation by natural
planetocentric nuclear fission reactors.”
[10]
viXra:0909.0037
Nature of Planetary Matter and Magnetic Field
Generation in the Solar System
Authors:
J. Marvin Herndon
Distance ladder
One of the most daunting yet
pressing challenges to be overcome in cosmology
is establishing remoteness in space and time. At
extragalactic scales, standard methods falter
into great uncertainty, and in the absence of
independent checks, important benchmarks used in
building the cosmological big picture are
notoriously unreliable. Canadian mathematician
Bruce Rout has devised an independent, novel
means of estimating distance based on the spiral
morphology of galaxies. Although they are yet to
be tested by peer review (formal or informal)
his conclusions nevertheless challenging for the
Hubble Law and universal expansion models, and
may spark robust debate. “To date, methods of
direct measurement of the distance to galaxies
have been limited in their range. This paper
makes direct measurements of distant galaxies by
comparing spiral arm structures to the expected
locus of gravitational influence along the
geodesic in a centripetally accelerating
reference frame. Such measurements provide a
method of independent validation of the
extragalactic distance ladder without
presupposition of the uniformly expanding
universe theory. The methodology of this paper
avoids the use of Hubble's constant in the
measurement of the distance to galaxies beyond
the range of contemporary direct measurement
methods. The measurements are validated by
meaningful trends between distance and other
variables such as mass, rotational velocity,
size and angular momentum to validate the
measurements made. A Hubble diagram calculated
using this method is presented from data
obtained from 111 spiral galaxies in the
southern hemisphere to about 200 MPc distance.
The galactic red shift from these galaxies
appears independent to distance. Galactic
structure, size, masses and angular momentum are
seen to have a distinct relationship to the spin
velocity, or tangential velocity, associated
with each galaxy.”
[82]
viXra:0911.0023
Distance, Rotational Velocities, Red Shift,
Mass, Length and Angular Momentum of 111 Spiral
Galaxies in the Southern Hemisphere
Authors:
Bruce Rout
“The
measurement of relative extragalactic distances
has become fairly routine, but estimates of
absolute distances are rare. In the vicinity of
the Sun, direct geometric techniques for
obtaining absolute distances, such as orbital
parallax, are feasible, but heretofore such
techniques have been difficult to apply to other
galaxies. As a result, uncertainties in the
expansion rate and age of the Universe are
dominated by uncertainties in the absolute
calibration of the extragalactic distance
ladder. Here we compare previous distance
measurements to the galaxy NGC 4258 from both an
estimate of Hubble’s constant and a direct
measurement of orbital motions in a disk of gas
surrounding the nucleus of this galaxy to a
direct measurement using a model of constant
rotational velocity and galactic spiral
morphology. The results of the comparison help
validate methods of direct measurement of spiral
galaxies to much greater distances.”
[76]
viXra:0911.0016
A Comparison of Distance Measurements to NGC
4258
Authors:
Bruce Rout
Gravitation
“We present a
novel solution of the Mercury perihelion advance
shift in the new gravity model. It is found that
the non-relativistic reduction of the Dirac
equation with the gravitational potential
produces the new gravitational potential... This
potential can explain the Mercury perihelion
advance shift without any free parameters. Also,
it can give rise to the ω−shift of the GPS
satellite… “
[156]
gen-phys
arXiv:0911.2086
Title:
Novel Solution of Mercury Perihelion Shift
Authors:
Takehisa Fujita,
Naohiro Kanda
Evolution
Along with the distance
ladder, the “ageing ladder” constitutes a major
challenge to astrophysicists. The two are linked
in the LCDM model, where redshift is linked to
lookback time, which may be misleading. This
paper by Martín López-Corredoira gives ageing
results for galaxies with high redshift.
[655]
arXiv:0911.3825
Title:
Intrinsic colors and ages of extremely red
elliptical galaxies at high redshift
Authors:
Martin Lopez-Corredoira
We haven’t heard from Jack
Sulentic for some time, and welcome this
historical view of galaxies that are peculiar in
that they appear to unbound to any clustered
system, and therefore provide a unique window on
galaxy properties uncontaminated by neighbours.
[943]
arXiv:0911.5663
Title:
Forty Years of Research on Isolated Galaxies
Authors:
J. W. Sulentic
GRBs, Black Holes, and consensus
Bing Zhang has produced a
summary of Standard Model principles that
clearly illustrates the circularity of
redshift-based astrophysics. The results are
synthetically coloured by assumptions from the
model.
[29]
arXiv:0911.0202
Title:
Astrophysics: Most distant cosmic blast seen
Authors:
Bing Zhang
Dark Matter/Electromagnetism/MOND
“To fully understand the
present position concerning so-called dark
matter, it is necessary to examine the
historical background since, only by following
this approach, do all the pieces of the puzzle
fall into place. Here an attempt is made to do
this briefly and it is found that an interesting
and important question is raised. This question
relates to the position of electromagnetism in
astronomical considerations since history
indicates that, in the years following the
beginning of the 20th century, interest in
electromagnetic effects appeared to wane. Hence,
following an examination of the history and the
presently accepted position where reliance for
solutions seems confined to examining
gravitational effects, attention is turned to
hypotheses based on plasma physics to see if a
more feasible solution to the problem of the
missing mass can be furnished utilising its
fundamental ideas. While the purpose here is to
concentrate on dark matter and the supposed need
for its introduction into physics, this
consideration of electromagnetic effects
combined with the realisation that most matter
in the Universe is in the form of plasma also
indicates alternative routes to seeking
solutions for other puzzling astronomical
phenomena.”
[308]
arXiv:0911.4187
Title: Does
Physics Need 'Dark Matter'?
Authors:
Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Glenn Starkman, who had two
papers presented at CCC1, has in his recent
publications shown an increasing scepticism of
the Standard Model. He has openly declared that
he finds evidence that the CMBR is
non-cosmological, and now joins other eminent
investigators in the field (including George
Ellis and Richard Lieu) in being critical of the
implementation of dark fields in cosmology.
“The observed matter in
the universe accounts for just 5 percent of the
observed gravity. A possible explanation is that
Newton's and Einstein's theories of gravity fail
where gravity is either weak or enhanced. The
modified theory of Newtonian dynamics (MOND)
reproduces, without dark matter, spiral-galaxy
orbital motions and the relation between
luminosity and rotation in galaxies, although
not in clusters. Recent extensions of Einstein's
theory are theoretically more complete. They
inevitably include dark fields that seed
structure growth, and they may explain recent
weak lensing data. However, the presence of dark
fields reduces calculability and comes at the
expense of the original MOND premise -- that the
matter we see is the sole source of gravity.
Observational tests of the relic radiation, weak
lensing, and the growth of structure may
distinguish modified gravity from dark matter.”
[224]
arXiv:0911.1212
Title:
Einstein's Theory of Gravity and the Problem of
Missing Mass
Authors:
Pedro G. Ferreira and
Glenn Starkmann
“We compare the
observations to the theoretical predictions
using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which is
appropriate for small samples. We find that,
with the currently available data, the MOND
prediction for the velocity distribution can
only be excluded with a very low confidence
level, clearly insufficient to claim that MOND
is falsified.”
[751]
arXiv:0911.4485
Title: Current
data on the globular cluster Palomar 14 are not
inconsistent with MOND
Authors:
Gianfranco Gentile,
Benoit Famaey,
Garry W. Angus,
Pavel Kroupa
Quasars
“It is shown here that a
periodicity of Delta(z)~0.6 is imprinted on the
redshift-number distribution by this selection
effect. Because this effect cannot be rigorously
corrected for, astronomers need to be aware of
it in any investigation that uses the SDSS N(z)
distribution. Its presence also means that the
SDSS quasar data cannot be used either to
confirm or to rule out the Delta(z)~0.6 redshift
period reported previously in other, unrelated
quasar data.”
955]
arXiv:0911.5700
Title: Selection
Effects in the SDSS Quasar Sample: The Filter
Gap Footprint
Authors:
M.B. Bell,
S.P. Comeau
“We prove that the
linearized version of GR cannot actually give
any frame-dragging effect a la Lense-Thirring.
Accordingly, the recent experimental results,
which affirm the physical existence of such
effect, must be explained otherwise.”
[122]gen-phys
arXiv:0911.1498
Title: On the
Lense-Thirring effect
Authors:
A. Loinger,
T. Marsico
Title of the Month
A contradiction in terms?
[284]
arXiv:0911.1639
Title: Black
Hole Outflows
Authors:
A.R. King
|